×
  • Tech - News - Tech Companies
  • Updated: March 07, 2023

BVAS Reconfiguration Request: INEC Caught In Another Own Goal

BVAS Reconfiguration Request: INEC Caught In Another Own Goa

If the latest reports that the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) is seeking to be granted permission to reconfigure the Bimodal Voter Accreditation System (BVAS) ahead of the upcoming gubernatorial elections is anything to go by, it might as well be another one of the numerous own goals of INEC against itself lately.

Acting as the umpire in a presidential election that is currently trending locally and internationally as the worst in the annals of Nigeria's electoral history, and coming thereafter to appeal for permission to re-configure the same BVAS equipment used in the process is an admission of culpability in the flawed presidential election process.

In different climes, this may be enough tool in the hands of legislators to ask the INEC chairman to step down.

Yet-to-be-confirmed reports have it that the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) has urged the Presidential Election Petition Tribunal to amend the orders that were granted to candidates of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) and Labour Party (LP), Atiku Abubakar and Peter Obi respectively to inspect materials used for the last presidential election.

The Commission, in a motion on notice filed on March 4, is praying the court to vary the order, which restrained it from tampering with materials used for the election. 

INEC said it needs to reconfigure the Bimodal Voter Accreditation System (BVAS) for the next round of elections.

The appellate court had on March 3, granted leave to Atiku and Obi to inspect election materials used by INEC to conduct the controversial February 25 poll.

The court granted the order sought by the two parties, following two separate ex parte applications filed by Atiku and Obi, who came second and third respectively in the election won by Asiwaju Bola Tinubu of the All Progressives Congress (APC). 

The application filed by the Commission is asking the court to vary the order to allow it to reconfigure its BVAS for the March 11 governorship and state houses of assembly elections.

Reacting to the variation request, Abuja-based lawyer, Elias Offor, observed: “The court will be engendering injustice and that’s the position.

“They are actually giving vent to the disintegration of the country because such a reason is not tenable in any way.

“They will tamper with already existing data.

“They have to get another one to use for Saturday’s election. You know the polity is heated and they need it for evidence.

“So, why would they tamper with it? Do you know this is technological evidence?

“The petitioners have to call experts for opinions, serious expert opinions, IT personnel, and all that. Experts are to air their views on this whole thing.

“If the data is going to be tampered with, then there is no need to use the same one for the next election. They have to provide another one.

“If everything were consistent, we wouldn’t be making this argument.

“If you had done what you were supposed to do, then we are not going to be saying this.

“So, this one is illogical.” 

Another attorney, Douglas Ogbankwa, shared: “We need to find out the exact details of the variation sought by INEC.

“The variation sought seems clouded in mystery.

“It is important we know exactly what is sought to know the level of effect the variation sought will have on Labour Party having access to the electoral materials.

Lagos lawyer, Festus Ogun, noted: “In my opinion, I think the court is functus officio.

“By making the order, INEC cannot go back to the court, seeking to vary its order, unless it can prove fraud or misrepresentation.

“But the argument they are canvassing is that they want to reconfigure the BVAS because of the election coming up over the weekend. Yes.

“That is not a case of misrepresentation. Neither is it a case of, you know, fraud.

“So, I think they are asking the court to vacate this order indirectly.” 

Kano-based lawyer Abubakar Sani, however, said everybody is supposed to have access to court.

He added that the question is whether the inspection the petitioners sought to have will impede the function of INEC in conducting the governorship election this Saturday. 

“We don’t know whether the court will grant it or not but if it is the question of access to court, INEC has the constitutional powers to approach the court.

“You cannot deny INEC the constitutional right to conduct an election. It is there in the constitution.

“If they need the equipment to conduct the election, you cannot deny them the right.

“INEC can comply with the order after the election if the nature of the reconfiguration will not tamper with the evidence in the BVAS,” he explained.

Related Topics

Join our Telegram platform to get news update Join Now

0 Comment(s)

See this post in...

Notice

We have selected third parties to use cookies for technical purposes as specified in the Cookie Policy. Use the “Accept All” button to consent or “Customize” button to set your cookie tracking settings