×
  • Oil & Gas - News
  • Updated: December 24, 2021

Regulators, Beyelsa Government Disagree On Cause Of Nembe Oil Spill

Regulators, Beyelsa Government Disagree On Cause Of Nembe Oi

The regulatory agencies investigating the Nov. 5 oil spill at Oil Mining Lease (OML) 29 at Nembe Bayelsa on Thursday attributed the spillage to sabotage.

The accident polluted the Santa Barbra River and Nembe Creeks. A statutory probe that follows every reported leak incident, the Joint Investigative Visit (JIV) ascertained the cause, volume and impacted areas on Wednesday following a visit by the Minister of State for Environment, Sharon Ikeazor. 

The JIV is usually convened by the operator of the leak facility and it comprises representatives of the oil firm, affected communities, regulators and the state ministry of environment.

Representatives of the National Oil Spills Detection and Response Agency (NOSDRA) and the Nigerian Upstream Petroleum Regulatory Commission (NUPRC) told newsmen after the visit they traced the leak to sabotage.

NOSDRA’s representative on JIV, Ismail Baba-Ahmed said based on his experience in fluid mechanics and interactions with well-head experts who plugged the leak, only vandalism could have caused the spill.

He said the threading on the well head casing from where the valve was removed was not worn out, a development that suggests that the leak was not caused by pressure.

Adetoyibo Adeyemi of NUPRC agreed with NOSDRA that a physical examination of the failed well head indicated that the pressure from the oil well was not sufficient enough to blow it.

Enai Reuben, Head of Pollution Control, Bayelsa Ministry of Environment, however, told newsmen that the inspection was inconclusive because the JIV team could not see the exact point of the leak.

Therefore, Reuben said, it would be inaccurate to draw a conclusion on the cause of the spill.

“It will be inaccurate to draw a conclusion without seeing the leak point.  In an investigation it is called the evidence-based conclusion”, he said.

He wondered why the well head could not be preserved for evaluation after the leak was stopped.

The leak which was reported on Nov. 5 was plugged on Dec. 8, while 16,280 barrels of crude and crude sediments were recovered from the incident site.

Related Topics

Join our Telegram platform to get news update Join Now

0 Comment(s)

See this post in...

Notice

We have selected third parties to use cookies for technical purposes as specified in the Cookie Policy. Use the “Accept All” button to consent or “Customize” button to set your cookie tracking settings